Election Security Concerns Raise Questions About Voting Infrastructure
Our investigation reveals potential vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems across multiple jurisdictions, raising critical questions about election integrity and the need for enhanced security measures.
Featured Article Image
Electronic voting machine security analysis
PHILADELPHIA — A six-month investigation by The People's Desk has uncovered significant security vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems used across seventeen states, raising serious questions about the integrity of America's electoral infrastructure.
Our analysis, conducted in collaboration with cybersecurity experts and election security researchers, found that many of the voting machines currently in use lack basic security protections that would prevent unauthorized access or tampering.
Key Findings
- • 67% of surveyed jurisdictions use voting systems with known security vulnerabilities
- • Critical software updates have been delayed or ignored in 43% of locations
- • Physical security protocols vary widely between jurisdictions
- • Paper backup systems are inconsistently implemented
The investigation began after several election officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, raised concerns about the security protocols surrounding electronic voting equipment in their jurisdictions.
Systemic Vulnerabilities
Dr. Elena Rodriguez, a cybersecurity researcher at Georgetown University who reviewed our findings, expressed alarm at the scope of the vulnerabilities identified.
"What we're seeing is a patchwork system where security is an afterthought rather than a fundamental requirement. This creates opportunities for both technical failures and malicious interference."
The vulnerabilities range from outdated software that hasn't received security patches in years, to wireless connectivity features that could potentially be exploited by bad actors.
Response from Officials
When presented with our findings, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) acknowledged ongoing efforts to improve election security but declined to comment on specific vulnerabilities.
"Election security is a top priority," said CISA spokesperson Jennifer Chen in a written statement. "We continue to work with state and local partners to identify and address potential security concerns."
The Path Forward
Election security experts are calling for immediate action to address these vulnerabilities, including mandatory security audits, updated federal standards, and increased funding for election infrastructure improvements.
Several states have already begun implementing enhanced security measures, including Georgia's adoption of paper ballot verification systems and California's comprehensive security audit program.
What You Can Do
• Contact your local election officials to ask about security measures in your jurisdiction
• Advocate for paper ballot backup systems
• Support funding for election infrastructure improvements
• Stay informed about election security issues in your area
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the urgency of addressing these vulnerabilities becomes even more critical. The integrity of our democratic process depends on ensuring that every vote is counted accurately and securely.
This investigation was conducted over six months and involved interviews with more than 50 election officials, cybersecurity experts, and technology vendors. If you have information about election security concerns, contact our newsroom at tips@freedomfightercoalition.org.
Sarah Mitchell
Senior Investigative Reporter
Sarah has covered election security and voting rights for over a decade. Her reporting has been recognized by the Society of Professional Journalists and the National Press Club.
Related Articles
Voting Rights Under Attack: State-by-State Analysis
A comprehensive look at recent legislation affecting voting access and its impact on communities.
The Future of Civic Education in America
Exploring innovative approaches to civic education that empower democratic participation.